Determining production efficiency factor


There is no single or exact method to determine production efficiency factor as there are too many factors involved, and it is neither feasible nor desirable to evaluate the effect of all such factors affecting production efficiency. At the planning stage, a project planner or estimator cannot take care all the controllable and enforceable factors. It is possible that some of these may have been considered while establishing the basic productivity norms.

Further, it is not necessary to consider the effect of all the factors while modifying basic norms as some of these may overlap, while a few may have only a marginal effect on overall productivity. It is better to limit the computation of adjustment in productivity to four to six prominent factors which contribute significantly to overall productivity, and omit other factors.  By using his experience and skill, the planner identifies the main factors that affect productivity, evaluates their implications, and finally transforms the basic productivity norms into workers productivity standards conforming in the characteristics of the project under consideration.

Another approach to evaluate the main factors that influence workers production efficiency is to divide the production efficiency range into three basic ranges corresponding to ‘low’, ‘average’, and ‘high’ productivity conditions. The low condition ranges from 40-60% efficiency, average from 60-80% and high from 80-100%.

Each major factor affecting efficiency is the evaluated considering the site conditions. This evaluation, for a typical project, is given below:


Production Elements
Efficiency (in %)              
Nature of work
75
Supervision
90
Labour Market
80
Climate and working conditions
60
Equipment orientation
50
Total
355

The average production efficiency (355/5) is 71.0% of the basic productivity norms. The standard productivity for each item of work is then obtained by multiplying the basic norms with the evaluated average production efficiency factor of the work process. However, this structured approach only provides guideline  and its outcome can best be taken as an approximate to be further scrutinized by the planner and construction engineers.

The worker’s productivity data used in the initial stages of the planning process may not necessarily be the worker’s productivity standards used for controlling worker’s performance. During the execution stage, the initially assessed productivity is subjected to further reviews, if necessary.